Wednesday 17 April 2013

Bollinger La Grand Année 2004

La Grand Année is Bollinger's vintage release and going in I was expecting a lot of power and depth. It is Pinot Noir dominant, aged for 5 years in bottle on the lees, after first fermentation in oak barrels.

Appearance: Light and fresh, yet with a gold tint. Concise and intense bubbles

Nose: It is a rather punchy nose, with toasty overtones, yeast, orange peel and hints of vanilla and clove.

Palate: Following the impressive nose, the palate shows an array of ripe fruits: pear, fig and blackcurrant.  A burst of citrus acidity on the finish is accompanied by a lingering minerality, while there are secondary notes of honey and soft, faint spices.

Rating: A lovely wine, although perhaps a little young (drunk April 2013). Following 2002 was always going to be tough, yet the wine is fresh, complex and exciting - it holds its own. Pricey, but worth the treat for a special occasion, boasting the craftsmanship and time that has gone into producing it. 8.2/10

Tuesday 16 April 2013

Sciences Po International Tasting at Bollinger


This past weekend I was lucky enough to be selected to go as part of a St Andrews team of three to a tasting competition held at Bollinger, organised by the Parisian university Sciences Po. It was a competition unlike any I have done so far, with questions ranging from theoretical (about grapes permitted in specific regions, average prices, etc) to practical (arrange the following wines in order of age, which is not French and where is it from?). With twelve other university teams competing from all over Europe, the competition was fierce: the MC allowed teams between 30 seconds and 3 minutes per question depending on the difficulty, leaving little room for too much speculation. Three teams proceeded to a final round where they were given a Champagne and a red, along with 3 minutes, before presenting their findings to the judges and other competitors.

Bollinger La Grande Année Rose 1999, 2002, 2004
These sort of questions force you to focus on particular aspects of different wines and I found really helped to break up the components of each. Take, for example, the first practical question in the Champagne section. We were presented with 3 Bollinger La Grande Année Rosés and asked to sort them by age. Instead of approaching the nose and palate looking for hints of what the grape make-up could potentially be, we had to look for oak exposure, development of yeast (noting time spent ageing on the lees), strength and integration of the bubbles and complexity of the palate, all of which could indicate specifically how old a wine is. By breaking each section down into a specific aspect of the wines, I found a greater appreciation for all the factors that make up a particular bottle.
The first Rosé was dark in colour, a deep pink, with orange tinges. It showed a great deal of muscovado sugar, toasted brioche and currant flavours, but also had a strong acidity that suggested age, but perhaps not too much. It was a wine with a powerful and voluptuous palate that clearly was from a stellar vintage. The second was much more integrated as a whole mouthful, with softer acidity and lengthy sweet berry flavours, candied peel and buttery pastry. It was, however, not quite as dark in colour, and appeared lighter in consistency. The third showed a much stronger acidity and plenty of citrus on the nose. It was the lightest of the three and the palate didn't have the composure and length of the first two. Having said this, it still was a vintage Bollinger thought worthy of making a single release from, and clearly was very high quality! From that, the third would appear the youngest, while the first and second are tougher: either the first is marginally older (because of colour and power of flavour), or the second is older (because of complexity, development) and the first is just outstanding quality. As it happened, the latter was the case, with the first being 2002, the second 1999 and the third 2004.
Jeroboams ageing on the lees
Following the competition, we were treated to a tour of the Bollinger caves. This was particularly fascinating for a number of reasons for me: as well as being famous for ageing their wines far beyond what is required, Bollinger is one of relatively few Champagne houses that use oak barrels for fermentation (4,500 in total). That, along with their high percentage of Pinot Noir in every release (a minimum of 60%), gives a strong and robust wine, with a great deal of body. Looking down at the ageing process, it is clear to see that the house is obsessed with producing wine of the highest quality. The still wines (Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Pinot Meunier) which make up their final blend are fermented first mostly in oak barrels. From there, many are bottled into magnums and left in the cellars to age: the reasoning being that magnums provide the perfect sized container for ageing. After that, the still wines are blended to whatever cépage is desired and rebottled with yeast for a second fermentation. They are then left to ferment and age on the lees and are turned a few degrees every day in order to keep the yeast contact high: a process called riddling. We were told a single riddler can turn up to 25,000 bottles per day by hand - definitely needed when the cellars hold over 10 million bottles, all at different stages of the process.
Pinot Noir vines at Champagne Bollinger
My second visit to Champagne has only increased my appreciation for the wines that are grown there - hopefully it won't be the last! Bollinger's astonishing ageing process is certainly evident in their wines and there will be shorter reviews of certain cuvées coming soon so watch out for those for any tips. Huge thanks must go to Sciences Po for organising such a fantastic and challenging competition.

Sunday 7 April 2013

Dog Strangler Mourvedre, Consolation, Roussillon, France, 2009

Not normally a single varietal, this interesting wine is from the under-appreciated South of France. 

Appearance: A deep inky purple.

Nose: A tight meaty nose at first, it turns rounder and plusher after a few minutes. Notes of blackcurrant, mint, cedar and anise, as well as a vegetal undertone.

Palate: At first the palate is rather savoury. It opens with oak, sour cherry and bitter chocolate. It then, however, moves to a plummy and soft finish with warm tannins.

Rating: Overall, a strong and robust red. It is lengthy and very pleasant: perfect for a hearty cheese selection and worth the price (<20) 8/10.

Friday 5 April 2013

Essensia Orange Muscat, Quady Vineyards, California, USA, 2009

Hello all, for my first dessert wine review I've chosen a funky sweet wine from California. It's made from Orange Muscat, which is only used in California and Australia and produces a wine with a distinctly orange flavour (as one would expect!). 

Appearance: It is a deep gold, and very inviting. Appears to be quick thick - a proper sweet wine!

Nose: It has an intense nose of orange blossom, dried apricot and mango, but also a hint of alcohol. There is a slight hint of sweet oakey spices and vanilla also.

Palate: The Essensia is very voluptuous: tropical fruits and orange juice lead to a zing of citrus peel acidity near the finish, with a lengthy and sweet finish that shows dried pineapple. It is fortified (slightly) to take it to 15%, but it is not overpowering, merely powerful.

Rating: An interesting wine that is absolutely delicious and would be a worthy accompaniment to any fruit dessert. Attractively priced (around £10/half bottle) and distinctly Californian: well worth buying. 8/10

Tuesday 2 April 2013

Ridge Vineyards Geyserville Zinfandel, California, USA, 1999

For my first red wine review I have decided to review a wine I first tried at Christmas, and again this past Sunday with Easter dinner. Since I first started working with and getting into wine, Ridge has always been a personal favourite. However, this bottle is the oldest of their Zins that I have managed to try.

Appearance: It has a deep, dark centre with a lighter purple tinge towards the edges. It clings invitingly to the edges of the glass when swirls and doesn't have the off-putting thickness that some Zins can get.

Nose: The wine has an inviting nose, yet it is a little subdued (which only increases curiosity). I could pick out plums, savoury oaked spice - cloves, mostly - and a vegetal hint towards the end of my breath.

Palate: The palate comes in three waves. First, a plush, fruity burst of stewed cherry with a zing of redcurrant. Second, grippy tannins lengthen the taste with soft oaked spices, cinnamon and a touch of black pepper. This continues to the third: a powerful finish that is in no way sticky or overdone, leaving notes of tobacco, plum, cedar and dancing spices.

Rating: I rarely get to try wines such as this and I am certainly glad I was able to enjoy it with a meal to match - I would definitely recommend a roast lamb dish with any Ridge reds. Its astonishing length, beautifully composed and well-blended palate cannot really be faulted. It is full bodied, without being too thick, powerful, yet not aggressive. I wouldn't imagine it will be this good for many more years, so if you see a bottle - buy it! 9.5/10                                                                    

Monday 1 April 2013

Simonsig Chardonnay, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2010

This Chardonnay has been served at the Seafood Restaurant for as long as I have worked there and is always a lovely bottle.

Appearance: Deep gold, with a green tinge.

Nose: It shows some impressive body right off the mark, with an earthy minerality. Notes of brioche, vanilla sweetness and orange blossom lead to a touch of citrus.

Palate: There is a thickness to it, yet it is not cloying. A tropical mid-palate of melon and pineapple may taste a little sweet to those not completely sold on powerful Chardonnays, but it leads to a bright acidity and oakey spice on the finish.

Rating: A lovely drop, showing how South African Chardonnay must be taken seriously. It also won't break the bank at around £12. 8/10.

Domaine Carneros Brut, Napa, USA, 2006

Welcome to a new type of post on my blog. From now on I shall have more regular, shorter posts detailing just tasting notes and a rating of particular wines. At longer intervals I will put up longer articles and reviews still, so keep an eye out for those! In keeping with a blind tasting technique I shall write these shorter posts conforming to a layout that details the wine's appearance, nose and palate, followed by a rating - hopefully this will give easy and fast recommendations...


The first wine I shall review in this way is Domaine Carneros' 2006 Brut, a sparkling wine made up of Pinot Noir and Chardonnay, from Napa and Sonoma in California. Interestingly, the label is owned by Taittinger and all the sparkling wines are made in the traditional French style - that is to say that the wine is fermented a second time (after blending) in the bottle - and is aged there for 3 years before release.

Appearance: Light and straw-coloured with a hint of gold.

Nose: Complex, with toasty notes and hints of mango and apricot.

Palate: Zingy orange, dried mango and raspberry leaves present, with a lengthy finish and a well-rounded acidity that is anything but sharp.

Rating: Impressive, and clearly influenced by its French owners. 8.5/10